September 14, 2017

Juhfark

One of the greatest treasures of Hungarian wine is one that is not very well-known outside the Hungarian borders. No, it's not Tokaji wine – that is probably the greatest treasure in Hungary, but you have to remember that it is also a Slovak wine as well, as the borders of the Tokaj wine region extend to Slovakia as well. The wine I have in my mind is instead something very Hungarian, but also something so scarce you might have difficulties finding it – even in Hungary!

This treasure I speak of is – of course – Juhfark! That spectacular white grape variety that holds its spiritual home in the Somlói hills, capable of producing some stunning, world-class wines!

Juhfark, you say? Somló? Uh-huh. I think a little introduction might be in order here?

Do you know why the Rieslings from Rangen Grand Cru are so much more tightly-knit than those of other Grands Crus of Alsace? Do you know why Soave Classicos feel so much more focused and mineral compared to the wines from the surrounding Soave region? Do you know the saline tang in Canary Island wines or the Assyrtikos from Santorini? Do you know that piercing texture you can find in reds and whites of Etna? These aforementioned characteristics have very little to nothing to do with the vineyard slope, grape clones or winemaking techniques. What is the common denominator in these regions is the volcanic soil: vines grown on volcanic soil just tend to produce grapes with much more mineral, acid-driven and tight-textured – at times even austere – character.

Nagy-Somló or just Somló (pronounced shomlo) is one of the rare spots in Europe – along with the aforementioned regions – where you can find vines planted on purely volcanic soil. This wine region consists mainly of a dome-shaped hill, Somlóhegy, rising in isolation from the vast expanse of Pannonian plain like a colossal (1,5 km long; 1 km across) potato cut in half. This is because millions of years ago the basin, in which this hill is located, was a shallow Pannonian Sea and what currently is the Somló hill used to be an underwater volcanic vent, spewing volcanic matter out from the earth. What little geological contours the seabed – or the plain that followed as the sea dried up – have eroded away with time, but the harder volcanic soil of Somló has resisted erosion, still rising more than 400 meters above the surrounding plain. There are also smaller volcanic hills of Sághegy and Kissomlyó nearby that belong to the Somlói wine region, but all the wine produced in these lesser-known hills is sold through cellar doors and consumed locally.

Vines have been cultivated on the Somló hill for close to 2000 years with documents describing specific grape varieties to the region dating back to the 8th century, so the reputation of the wines from this unique region isn't exactly a new thing. The vines are planted all over the hill, with the southern vineyards getting more sun exposure, producing fleshier wines, and the northern vineyards producing lighter and more acid-driven wines. The region currently consists of no more than 820 hectares (2050 acres) but these vineyards are farmed by a whopping 1200 farmers – a huge number of them only very small producers, selling their crop to the bigger producers. The biggest producers here are Kreinbacher (40 ha / 100 acres) and Tornai (50 ha / 125 acres), together owning more than 10% of the plantings in Somló and purchasing grapes from a further 20-40 ha farmed by local small growers. Out of the more than a thousand growers, there are only some 50 who own more than a hectare (2,5 acres) of vineyards and only 42 are actually registered to sell bottled wine.

Historically there have been numerous grape varieties grown on the Somló hill – up to 46 different varieties – and the traditional way of making wine was to make precisely calculated, interplanted field blends of these different varieties so that a vineyard could consist of up to 40 different varieties per hectare. The old-school way of making so-called Somlai Bor was to harvest these field blends together and age the resulting wine for a long time (several years) in large oak vats. However, this style was lost upon the arrival of phylloxera and the remaining local varieties were lost forever when the remaining vineyards were uprooted under the communist rule and replanted with higher-yielding varieties. Today most of the low-quality varieties have been once again uprooted and replanted with the varieties traditionally grown in the region: Furming, Hárslevelű, Olaszrizling, Tramini, and – our theme variety of this post – Juhfark.

Juhfark (yuh-farck) is said to be one of the rather few varieties that are capable of expressing the terroir remarkably well, along with such classic (and often very mineral and high-acid) varieties such as Chenin Blanc, Nebbiolo, Pinot Noir and Riesling. It is hard to say how true this is, as there are only 170 hectares (430 acres) of Juhfark in existence, a great majority (150 hectares / 380 acres) of that in Hungary, with a lion's share located in Somló. This means that Juhfark might be very terroir-specific variety, but finding any Juhfark outside the terroirs of Somló for a comparative tasting can turn out to be a most difficult task. However, if the Juhfarks of Somló, aka. Somlói Juhfark are considered to be the best examples of this variety, I really don't think there is no need to really search for examples from elsewhere.

What makes these wines so unique is the aforementioned volcanic soil of Somló, which gives the wines both high acidity (which is evident if compared to the duller, lower-acid wines made from the grapes grown in the plains around the Somló hill) and very noticeable mineral character, giving the wines of Somló – especially Juhfark – tremendous structure and stunning aging capability. Although Hungarian white wines can often be high in acidity, this is all too often the result of a very early harvest. Instead in Somló, the grapes can be harvested much later, resulting in wines which have higher potential alcohol, higher level of ripeness and much more body with no loss of acidity. This, combined with the traditional – sometimes even quite rustic – winemaking practices, even including some degree of skin contact, can lead to wines with lots of power, mineral bitterness and noticeable amount of dry extract. These kinds of wines can be forbiddingly harsh and robust while they are young, but they often come together if given enough cellar age. It is no wonder that Somlói wines were so popular centuries ago: wines with this much structure and acidity could actually survive transportation across Europe, whereas the other Hungarian white wines could barely survive transportation beyond the neighboring village. Historically the traditional Somlói wine was one that was aged for years in old oak casks (still before the World War II the minimum aging dictated by the law was 5 years in oak) which not only contributed to the body and richness of the wine, but also gave them good defense against premature aging through slow, controlled oxidation. Such long aging regimes most likely gave the wines slightly oxidative – perhaps even a bit Sherry-like – character, but also tremendous cellaring potential. Unfortunately such wines are not made any longer, as stainless steel tanks and small, new oak barrels have replaced the big oak casks and the long cellaring is now at the hands of the consumer, not the producer.

Finally, a few anecdotes about Juhfark before moving on to the wines. First of all, "Juhfark" translates to "sheep's tail" – this is because the conical grape bunches supposedly are reminiscent of a sheep's tail. Secondly, the Somlói wine – and Juhfark in particular – have been thought to have various medicinal properties including help for blood pressure or stomach problems. The wines are also widely known as "wedding night wines" because of the belief that the wine helps in conceiving a baby boy.

Here is a small selection of different Juhfark wines that I have tasted, in no particular order:

Royal Somló Nagy-Somló J 2011
  • Royal Somló
  • Country: Hungary
  • Region: Nagy-Somló
  • Grape(s): Juhfark (100%)
  • Price: 5900 HUF (19,15€) / 0,75
  • Tasted on: 16th of September, 2016
The Royal Somló winery was founded in 2006 by Omar and Peter Csizmadia-Honigh when they purchased a 1 ha (2,5 acres) plot on the southern slope of Somló. Although these two Dutch-Hungarian guys live in London, they help with the viticultural tasks when needed. The winery itself is run by Peter's father, Károly Czismadia, who takes care of the winery and the vineyards year round. The Juhfark plot they own is still quite young and normally it produces enough fruit for 500-1,500 bottles of wine. However, in less-than-optimal vintages no wine is released. The winemaking is pretty hands-off and natural in style.

The "J" in the name stands for Juhfark. The grapes are normally harvested between late September and mid-October, depending on the vintage – in 2011 the grapes were harvested on 24th of September. The must had brief skin contact after the crush, followed by a transfer to three, old neutral oak barrels of 800, 630 and 150 litres, in which the wines were fermented with natural yeasts. The wines were bottled in July 2012, after 10 months of barrel aging.

Slightly grassy neon-green color.

Steely, green and somewhat vegetal – even musty – nose with somewhat funky aromas of beet, sheepish and slightly Chenin-esque notes of lanolin and wool socks, some unripe green apple and a vague hint of something waxy. Overall the nose doesn't feel that attractive.

The wine is surprisingly light-bodied, lively and vibrant on the palate, yet showing surprisingly much richness and concentration, contradicting the overall light feel of the wine. There are really bright and youthful, yet still quite neutral flavors of steely minerality, ripe green apples, some bitterness, a little bit of leesy yeast character and a hint of pithy grapefruit flesh with an overarching streak of woolly lanolin. Overall this kind of wine epitomizes the mineral neutrality of Somlói wines.

The finish is long, juicy and somewhat neutral with a woolly lanolin note and flavors of tangy green apples, steely minerality, wet stones, some smoke and a hint of bitterness.

Even though Royal Somló is a newcomer in the Somló wine scene, their wine is pretty much a typical example of Somlói Juhfark: the wine is steely, very mineral and somewhat very neutral while still being almost an antithesis to austere, with its obvious sense of concentration. What's noticeable, though, is that even after 5 years the wine seems very youthful with some noticeable sense of concentration.

86/100
Summary: Despite being a very classic, structured and mineral example of Somlói Juhfark, I was pretty put off by those rather sheepish aromas of lanolin and wool socks. In Chenin Blancs they can be quite attractive, but I've had some older Chablis wines with that same note and it can be quite off-putting is it too prominent. It really didn't make this wine unapproachable, but it certainly detracted from its enjoyability. This is a good wine, but definitely not in the top tier.

***

Spiegelberg Nagy-Somlói Juhfark 2012
  • Borpince István Spiegelberg
  • Country: Hungary
  • Region: Nagy-Somló
  • Grape(s): Juhfark (100%)
  • Price: 5900 HUF (19,15€) / 0,75
  • Tasted on: 16th of September, 2016
István Spiegelberg is as unique a producer as you can find in Somló. In his previous life this German-born Hungarian fellow was a DJ and a test driver for BWV. In 1993 his parents bought a farm in Somló for a summer cottage and Spiegelberg started making wine from the grapes grown on the property for a hobby. However, in 2007 Spiegelberg moved from Germany to this old farmhouse (with 2 hectares (5 acres) of vineyards but no electricity or running water) for good, just to make wine. He has studied under Béla Fekete, the Grand Old man of Somló, and makes his wines in somewhat similar ways: Spiegelberg's wines are made in a very non-interventionist fashion in Hungarian 500-liter oak barrels. The wines are fermented spontaneously with the aid of natural yeasts and aged for a long time in these oak barrels. The long aging period is pretty much a requirement, as Spiegelberg aims for a dry style, but as his cellars are cool and the natural yeasts can be finicky, the fermentation times can sometimes go well into spring, even take a whole year. During the aging Spiegelberg plays Gregorian chant music for the wine 24/7, as he believes this benefits the wine.

True to Spiegelberg's tyle, this wine is fermented with natural yeasts and aged for some 16 months in used 500-liter Hungarian oak barrels to the tunes of Gregorian chant music. 12,4% alcohol, 1,4 g/l of residual sugar and 5,1 g/l acidity. Only 1330 bottles produced.

Pale lemon yellow color.

Ripe, rich and perfumed nose with attractive, juicy aromatics of sweet florals, beeswax and some understated exotic fruit – yet the nose seems to suggest high acidity, cool climate and steeliness.

Ripe, rich and succulent in the mouth with flavors of lemon marmalade, steely minerality, some sweet exotic fruits, a little salinity, hints of honeydew melon and a touch of white peach. Quite full body with lots of intensity, moderate acidity and almost oily mouthfeel.

Quite long and lively finish with sweet flavors of ripe apple, some honey, hints of exotic spices and a touch of salinity.

A delightful, concentrated example of Juhfark from a warm vintage – and it shows. This wine is almost atypical in its abundance of ripe, sweet and yellow fruit in the stead of high acid and minerality. Yet these more austere characteristics show as well, giving the wine impressive structure and freshness. Still I can't help but thinking that this wine would be even more attractive with less ripeness and higher acidity.

92/100
Summary: Drinking wonderfully now, this wine will keep easily for some years – probably even for a decade. Worth its price at 19€, recommended.

***

Tornai Top Selection Grófi Juhfark 2013
  • Tornai Pincészet
  • Country: Hungary
  • Region: Nagy-Somló
  • Grape(s): Juhfark (100%)
  • Price: 4600 HUF (14,93€) / 0,75
  • Tasted on: 16th of September, 2016
At 50 hectares, Tornai is the biggest producer of Somlói wines. Founded in 1946, it is one of the very few private wineries to survive the communist rule. Often Tornai's wines are described as being very well-made and balanced, but perhaps a bit commercial and, thus, uninteresting if compared to the more traditionalist examples offered by the smaller producers. Tornai produces numerous varietal and blended wines at various tiers of quality; this Top Selection Grófi Juhfark is their flagship Juhfark wine produced only from their best Juhfark plot in minuscule quantities. The vintage of 2013 produced quite weighty and concentrated wines in Somló; this wine is rather powerful at 14,76% alcohol with 7,8 g/l of residual sugar and 7,6 g/l of acidity. The grapes were harvested as late as the end of October and the wine was aged for more than a year in 500-liter oak barrels. Bottled in early March 2015. Total production 3,650 bottles.

Medium-deep yellow color with faint green highlights.

The nose feels quite powerful, concentrated and complex with layered, kaleidoscopic aromas of star fruit, ripe peaches and apricots, stony minerality, some trebly vegetal overtones, a little bit of waxy character and creaminess from the barrel aging, light tropical fruit characteristics (that remind me of Austrian Zierfandler and Rotgipfler wines), a hint of nuttiness and a touch of sweet smoke. An impressive mélange of aromas.

The wine feels – as one would expect – rich, full-bodied and weighty with concentrated, almost chewy mouthfeel and intense flavors of stony minerality, star fruit, sour yellow plums, some nuttiness, a little bit of bright citrus fruits, a hint of dried pineapple and a touch of saline tang. Despite the oak aging, the wine really does not taste of oak; the barrel seems to have granted the wine lovely creamy and nutty undertones without becoming too overwhelming. True to the variety, the wine is remarkably high in acidity and, thus, very structured – despite coming across as noticeably ripe and weighty.

The finish is lively, long and rich with quite waxy character and complex flavors of stony minerality, dried apricots, some sweet smoke, a little bit of blood orange and a hint of nutty spice.

Although Tornai might get bad rap for making reductively made commercial and fruit-forward wines, this is anything but. The waxy, ever-so-slightly oxidative and impressively weighty flavors of the wine show perfectly how Juhfark can get very ripe yet still retain very impressive acid structure that shows no signs of faltering under such weight.

93/100
Summary: Although there are some delicate tertiary characteristics in the wine, the wine is still now, at 3 years of age, still a baby and obviously a long way away from its apogee. With its rich, weighty fruit, bright acidity and a balancing touch of residual sugar, it is easy to promise good aging potential for the wine. Expect this one change into something very Burgundian with a volcanic twist after 7-10 years of cellaring. Quite expensive for a Somló wine at 14,93€, but still a steal. Very highly recommended.

***

Fekete Somlói Juhfark 2009
  • Fekete Pince
  • Country: Hungary
  • Region: Nagy-Somló
  • Grape(s): Juhfark (100%)
  • Price: 6500 HUF (21,10€) / 0,75
  • Tasted on: 26th of August, 2016
Béla Fekete, born in 1926 and over 90 years old at the time of writing, is considered to be the godfather of Somló. He has been making wine since the late 1960's from purchased must and running his own winery since the early 70's, always with traditional methods. He has both increased his vineyard holdings (now at 3,5 hectares / 9 acres) and changed a bit his winemaking techniques with time – for example by introducing stainless steel tanks to the winery – but never at the expense of the classic style of his wines. The key characteristics of his wines are late harvest, natural fermentation and long aging regimes. Fekete made practically all the vineyard work by himself, only occasionally getting help from his son, until he retired in 2014 and sold his winery to three promising producers who have no intentions of changing the style mastered by Fekete.

The wine is made from specially selected grapes which are fermented spontaneously in old 1100-liter Hungarian oak casks with the help natural of natural yeasts. The wines are racked off their lees and left to age in these casks for 18 months, after which they are transferred to stainless steel tanks to avoid further oxidation and aged for a further 18 months. The wines are released to the market 3½ years after the vintage. 13,1% alcohol; 0,3 g/l of residual sugar; 5,7 g/l acidity; pH 3,22. Total production 4220 bottles.

Medium-deep golden yellow color.

Ripe, opulent and concentrated nose, although showing a light undertone of something green and grassy. Although the nose is more nuanced and subtle than intense and expressive, the overall feeling you get is very aromatic with really complex aromas of honeydew melon, ripe apple, some wizened yellow stone fruits, a little sappy greenness, a touch of dark cherry and a hint of mature oxidation giving the bouquet a slightly nutty edge..

The nose creates expectations of a big, full-bodied and heavy wine, but on the palate the wine is – as Juhfark so often is – ridiculously mineral and tightly-knit with piercing steely character, quite noticeable bitterness and bracing acidity. There are intense flavors of dried peach, iron, some stone dust, a little bit of aged waxy character and a hint of saline tang. The juicy flavors contrast the tightly-knit texture very nicely, although they get pretty much overwhelmed by the racy acidity and minerality.

The finish is really crisp, steely and sharp with pronounced, electric acidity and tangy flavors of stony, volcanic minerality, lemony citrus fruits, a little bit honeyed beeswax and hints of dried stone fruits.

A textbook example of a volcanic wine: the wine is a real acid powerhouse and almost quinine in its steely, mineral bitterness. However, very sharp and tightly-knit it may be, the wine still isn't austere and undrinkable. On the contrary, the ripeness and sense of concentration balance the structure very nicely – although the acid and minerality are still in the lead for now.

95/100
Summary: True to the Fekete style, this wine is still almost forbiddingly tightly wound and structure driven – even at almost 7 years of age – and will need years more to realize its full potential. This is something like drinking a 1er Cru Classé Bordeaux or a Champagne Prestige Cuvée right after it is released; it might be interesting, but you can get only a tiny glimpse of the potential the wine holds. If you really want to understand the Fekete wines fully, you need to start stocking them now and start drinking them not earlier than a decade into the future. These wines are spectacular, but definitely not for instant enjoyment.

***

Fekete Somlói Juhfark 2011
  • Fekete Pince
  • Country: Hungary
  • Region: Nagy-Somló
  • Grape(s): Juhfark (100%)
  • Price: 3500 HUF (13,36€) / 0,75
  • Tasted on: 16th of September, 2016
This wine is one of the last vintages ever made by Béla Fekete, the Grand Old Man of Somló. The wine is made from specially selected grapes which are fermented spontaneously in old 1100-liter Hungarian oak casks with the help natural of natural yeasts. The wines are racked off their lees and left to age in these casks for 18 months, after which they are transferred to stainless steel tanks to avoid further oxidation and aged for a further 18 months. The wines are released to the market 4 years after the vintage. 14,56% alcohol; 2,5 g/l of residual sugar; 5,7 g/l acidity; pH 3,55. Total production 3950 bottles.

Medium-deep yellow color with faint green highlights.

The nose is ridiculously complex with a stunning array of aromas, ranging from ripe and sweet notes of dried stone fruits, pineapple, banana and apricots to more complex aromas of smoky volcanic character, rhubarb jam and light hints of mushroomy earth.

Contrasting the sweet nose, the wine feels ridiculously tightly-knit, stern and mineral on the palate with bracing acidity and piercing steely minerality. Despite its harsh and almost austere texture, the wine still feels obviously very ripe with slightly oily mouthfeel and somewhat concentrated flavors of dried peach, green apples, subtle and complex spiciness, a little bit of salinity and a hint of candied lemon zest. The wine feels as tight as a piano wire.

Just like the midpalate, the finish is as steely, mineral and tightly-knit with austere texture and contrasting flavors of ripe yellow fruits, some beeswax, a little bit of ripe citrus fruits and a hint of saline tang.

You can often read how Fekete Juhfarks can be forbiddingly austere, rustic and almost aggressive when they are young, but you really have to taste one to believe. And they sure are. The wine is a stunning juxtaposition of acid-and-mineral-driven freshness and ridiculously complex, weighty ripeness. Even though it is quite hard to appreciate a wine this tightly wound, it doesn't take a genius to realize there is something otherworldly here.

95/100
Summary: This is a stunning wine by any standards, but it is and will be unapproachable for years. A wine like this needs years – perhaps even decades – to unwind, let the structure resolve and release the tertiary notes underneath. If opened now, the wine will need copious amounts of decanting to coax some fruit out. In a nutshell, this is one of the greatest Hungarian dry wines I've ever tasted, but will need extended cellaring to fully realize its potential. Ridiculous value at only 13,36€.

***

Kolonics Pinceszet Somlói Juhfark 2013
  • Kolonics Pinceszet
  • Country: Hungary
  • Region: Nagy-Somló
  • Grape(s): Juhfark (100%)
  • Price: 3200 HUF (10,35€) / 0,75
  • Tasted on: 22nd of March, 2017
I really had hard time looking for information on Kolonics, because the winery's home pages tell so very little. Basically all I could find out that this is a family winery, led by the 4th generation grower Károly Kolonics, they cultivate 3 hectares (7,5 acres) – of which 0,5 hectares (1,3 acres) is Juhfark – and they produce their wines in the traditional way: fermenting the wines with indigenous yeasts and aging them for prolonged periods of time (up to 3 years) in old oak and acacia barrels.

Apparently Kolonics makes several different bottlings of Juhfark – based on the information found on their website – but I really found no other way to distinguish these wines from each other, other than the faint, vertically repeating pictures left to the text in the bottle's label. I didn't find any information on how the wines differ from each other. This wine has 13% of alcohol and it was served blind to me.

Quite intense lime green color.

The nose is definitely characterful, yet also somewhat stuffy, with most curious aromas of steely minerality, lanolin, some wet wool socks, a little bit of wizened yellow fruits, a hint of spices and a touch of lager beer-like herbal character. First I think that this might be older Chenin Blanc or Chablis (the wool!), but then I remember that Royal Somló wine I had had a year earlier.

The wine feels medium-to-moderately full-bodied, powerful and remarkably concentrated with intense flavors of steely minerality, wool socks, wet stones, ripe apples, some dried peach and a hint of smoke. The wine is bone-dry and rather high in acidity. At this point I'm fairly sure this is Juhfark, because so very few Chenin and Chablis wines can reproduce such power and concentration – the odds are for Juhfark.

The finish is crisp, intense and very acid-driven with long flavors of stony minerality, some dried peach, a little bit of sandy soil and a hint of creaminess suggesting oak aging.

My first guess was correct: I said that this is pretty likely from Hungary, most likely from Somló and quite certainly a Juhfark, if my previous guesses were correct. The person who presented me this wine only said "correct", and seemingly unsurprised, revealed the bottle to be this Kolonics Juhfark. The other people, on the other hand, went completely wild on my deduction, because their guesses had been all the time completely wrong and, to add to their surprise, they had never heard of Somló, let alone of Juhfark.

88/100
Summary: All in all this wine is very similar to the Royal Somló J 2011 I mentioned earlier – only this time the woolly notes weren't as dominating and the wine came across more complex, balanced and interesting. Still I'd say that this wine was far behind those greatest Juhfarks I've had – although it might be just a matter of age. So many producers say Juhfark is not a wine meant to be enjoyed young, so maybe this was just too young and in dire need of cellaring? If I had a bottle of this, I'd play it sure and open it not earlier than after 5 more years of further aging.

Our tasting of Somlói wines; three Juhfarks to the fore.


If these wines didn't say it clearly enough, Juhfark has been a true revelation to me. I had been hearing a lot of positive things about this rare, magical variety for many years, but it wasn't until in 2016 when I finally got to taste one! Well, several.

However, as it is often said about Juhfark, it truly seems like a variety that really needs age. Based on the examples above, when young, the less impressive examples of Juhfark can be quite austere in their pronounced, stony minerality so that they offer very little enjoyment, whereas the better examples tend to be so freakishly tightly-knit and structured that they can be quite forbidding and aggressive. Although the styles can differ from wine to wine, all the wines seem to share some common traits: rather high acidity; very pronounced mineral character; and texture and structure that really screams for cellar aging!

After having tasted through these different wines I'm all the more convinced that I need to start sourcing some Juhfark bottles into my cellar and start aging them patiently. These wines finally showed me a world I had heard of before and now I need to go deeper and see what it really has to offer! Seeing how hard it is to find even young Juhfark wines, I really don't expect to come across an aged bottle – that's why I need to start taking some action if I ever want to taste an older Juhfark myself.

I strongly recommend you to follow my example.

August 20, 2017

Vertical of the month: Duc de Larsan Madiran 2005-2011

I hope my post on Tannat is still fresh in your memory! (If it isn't, you can always read it from here.) This is because this post is again on Tannat, that wonderful tannic monster from the Southwest France. This time, however, I'm not going to delve deep into the history of this grape variety nor discuss about the different styles it can be made into. Instead, as this is another one of my Monthly Vertical posts, I'm going to look into the specific Madiran wine Duc de Larsan and how it can stand up to the test of time.

First, a foreword. Duc de Larsan has been sold for a long time here in Finland in Alko, our state monopoly of alcohol. At approximately 10€ ($12 or £9) the wine is relatively inexpensive – taking into account that the cheapest available plonk here currently costs about 7€ ($8 or £6) – which does not give much promise aging-wise. It's just a lowly entry-level Madiran wine made by a huge (owning 1,400 hectares / 3,500 acres!) producer Castel Frères and – judging by a little bit of googling – its main market is most likely just Finland, because you're really hard-pressed to find any non-Finnish mentions of the wine. This also explains why there is no mention of the wine in the Castel Frères home page and why it is impossible to find any information whatsoever on the wine, bar the product profile in Alko's pages.

So, back to my original point point. Normally wines sold here for 10€ are just basic entry-level wines, only a notch above the horrendous nigh-drinkable plonk, definitely not wines that could be aged in a cellar. For the most part, these 10€ wines are meant to be drunk within the year and the best ones can age perhaps a year or two more. That's why I was surprised positively when I tasted Duc de Larsan for the first time – granted, it wasn't an outstanding wine by any means, but instead a quite typical for a French wine that's sold for 10€ here. However, it showed such high acidity and impressive tannins that I was stunned how it was possible to make such a seriously structured at that price point – normally what you'd get at that price point is either dilute Valpolicella or then just jammy, soft new world plonk where the acidity is replaced with residual sugar.

That's why I was understandably thrilled when I heard my friend had a bunch of different vintages of Duc de Larsan stashed away and offered me a seat in this vertical tasting of his. Now I could finally verify if my hunch was correct and this inexpensive little wine was actually capable of not just surviving, but actually developing in the cellar!

Duc de Larsan Madiran
AOC Madiran
  • Groupe Castel
  • Country: France
  • Region: Le Sud-Ouest, Madiran
  • Grape(s): Tannat, Cabernet Sauvignon
  • Price: 9,99€ / 0,75
The wine is made predominantly from Tannat, as dictated by the Appellation rules, with some Cabernet Sauvignon in the mix to soften up the wine a bit (it always cracks me up how there is a region where you can actually soften the wines with relatively the tannic Cabernet Sauvignon). The wine is aged in oak barrels – as pointed out by the label, stating elevé en fûts de chêne. Precise varietal compositions or aging times are not available, as I couldn't locate a single technical file on the wine.

***

Duc de Larsan Madiran 2011
AOC Madiran
  • Tasted on: 9th of January 2016

14% of alcohol.

Very dense and concentrated pitch-black color with ruby red highlights, true to the Tannat style. The nose feels very youthful, rich and concentrated with aromas of freshly picked dark berries, dark chocolate shavings, some sweet mocha character, a little bit of leather and a hint of raisin. The wine is very ripe, rich and full-bodied on the palate with extracted, chewy feel. There are flavors of ripe blackberries, sweet dark plums, chocolate oak, some juicy blackcurrants and a little bit of cocoa richness, offset by a touch of astringent bitterness. Overall the wine feels quite modern with pronounced oak character and lots of so ripe fruit flavors the wine comes across almost sweet, yet the wine is also tremendously structured with moderately high acidity and massive, tremendously grippy tannins. The finish is long, rich and juicy, yet also quite bitter and really mouth-drying. There are succulent flavors of sweet dark berries, fresh blackcurrants, some plummy fruit, a little bit of oak chocolate and a hint of smoke.

All in all this wine feels very modern, oak-heavy take on Madiran, yet also one that isn't stripped of its massive tannins – which isn't that commonplace with modern Madiran wines. Relatively ripe and sweet example of the Duc de Larsan style.

86/100
Summary: I'm really not thrilled about this wine's prominent oak character, as it feels like the wood is drowning most of the finer nuances of fruit underneath. Still the wine shows great promise with its concentrated fruit and tightly-knit structure, making it feels much younger than what it is now, at 4 years of age. Hence, with enough cellaring one might find a lovely wine underneath all that oak and ripeness in the future. Really great value for 9,99€.

***

Duc de Larsan Madiran 2009
AOC Madiran
  • Tasted on: 9th of January 2016

13,5% of alcohol.

Opaque black-red color. Somewhat closed nose with reticent aromas of dark plums, some sweet and slightly chocolatey oak character, a little bit of crunchy blackcurrant and hints of ripe dark berries. The wine feels concentrated, full-bodied and chewy on the palate with very dry and quite dense flavors of dark plums, plush dark berry character, tannic bitterness, some tart cranberry, a little bit of iron and a hint of cocoa oak. The wine is medium-to-moderate in acidity with abundant yet surprisingly ripe and powdery tannins. The finish is rich and quite oaky with long, ripe flavors of sweet plums, crunchy blackcurrants, some blackberries and a hint of cocoa. The tannins give the aftertaste a little bit of chewy, even a hint of mealy feel and make the wine end on a somewhat mouthdrying note.

I was expecting quite a massive wine for a 2009, but this was surprisingly well-proportioned an effort for such a warm vintage wine. Fortunately even the alcohol levels were quite moderate. Perhaps the warm vintage was the reason why the tannins were this time relatively smooth and mellow?

87/100
Summary: A nice and surprisingly balanced example of the Duc de Larsan style. The oak seems to be integrating with the fruit pretty nicely, but there is still quite a bit of it left, so even though the wine is starting to drink nicely, there are no hurries with this one. Great value at 9,99€.

***

Duc de Larsan Madiran 2008
AOC Madiran
  • Tasted on: 9th of January 2016

13% of alcohol.

Somewhat translucent, yet still quite opaque and surprisingly youthful, purple-hued cherry color. The opacity is starting to give way, if compared to more opaque vintages 2009 and 2011. The nose seems somewhat developed and a bit sharp with aromas of smoke, dusty earth and some herbal greenness with some plummy dark fruit, a little bit of sweet oak and a hint of minty coolness. There is some obvious sense of weight and concentration on the palate and the body is full and chewy. Flavor-wise the wine is dominated by minty herbal character, some spicy oak and notes of dusty cellar. The fruit department feels a bit subdued, but still pretty much alive with flavors of sweet dark fruits, crunchy blackcurrants and ripe red berries. The structure is still very impressive and tightly-knit with abundant, grippy tannins and high acidity that feels noticeably higher than in vintages 2009 or 2011. The finish is rich, long and very astringent with massive, mouth-drying tannins and fruit flavors of ripe plums and blackcurrants. The oak character feels much more noticeable than in midpalate, giving the aftertaste a rather sweet note of oak spice and chocolate milkshake.

There was some discussion whether this wine suffered from TCA or not, but we decided on the wine being OK, seeing how the dusty aromas really didn't smell that corky and there was still pretty much fruit left to the wine. The fruit department seemed rather subdued and thin when compared to the surrounding vintages, however.

86/100
Summary: All in all, this is one of the most seriously structured Duc de Larsan wines in the past handful of vintages. Still very concentrated and brooding in style, yet starting to shows subtle signs of age as well. Hopefully the reticent fruit character can be chalked up to bottle variation, as the structure still needs some more aging in a cellar to resolve. Good, but nothing outstanding here. Priced according to its quality at 9,99€.

***

Duc de Larsan Madiran 2007
AOC Madiran
  • Tasted on: 9th of January 2016

13,5% of alcohol.

Somewhat translucent, slightly developed dark cherry color with a hint of mature figgy hue towards the rim. Somewhat closed and reticent nose with aromas of dusty earth, some dark plummy fruit, a little bit of savory, dark-toned oak spice and hints of crunchy dark berries. The wine is full-bodied, weighty and super-juicy on the palate with rich, chewy flavors of ripe dark plums, some developed notes of sweet dates, a little bit of juicy blackberries and a hint of bitterness. Even at 8 years of age the dark-toned mocha oak character seems quite prominent, although the tannins start to feel a bit resolved and less grippy than in the younger vintages. The wine is modest-to-medium in acidity, further emphasizing the richness and juicy quality of the fruit. The aftertaste feels more tannic and mouthdryingly astringent than the midpalate. There are long, rich and complex flavors of sweet oak, ripe dark berries, some blood, a little bit of dill and an umami hint of beef consommé in the slightly developed aftertaste.

In our tasting this was the favorite wine of many, but not for me – the wine was still too oaky for my taste and the acidity felt less than adequate here, making the wine feel somewhat tired and flabby. However, there was still lots of very nice qualities to the wine, so despite being quite a bruiser, this was overall a positive experience.

87/100
Summary: At 8 years of age, the wine is starting to show some mature qualities, but as it still feels relatively youthful I can't help wondering how long-lived wines these 10€ wines can really be and how on earth they age at a glacial pace? I guess that's the Tannat doing its magic tricks.

***

Duc de Larsan Madiran 2005
AOC Madiran
  • Tasted on: 9th of January 2016

13% of alcohol. The oldest wine in our tasting of vintages 2005–2011. This is supposed to be a warm vintage, but the alcohol level is the lowest among these vintages.

Dark, luminous cherry color with some transparency – obviously the least opaque wine in our tasting. The nose is complex and starting to show some developed character with aromas of plums, ripe dark berries, some nuanced mocha oak, a little bit of dried figs, a hint of chocolatey oak spice, a whiff of dusty earth and a touch of dill.

The wine is medium-bodied on the palate with velvety mouthfeel. There are nuanced flavors of ripe dark fruits, some sweet oak spice, a little bit of succulent, sweet dark berries, a hint of tangy, fresh blackcurrant and a nice, balancing streak of sour cherry bitterness. The tannins feel quite ample, but they have become surprisingly soft and mellow with age, letting the quite high acidity take care of the structure. The finish is long, complex and developed with ripe dark berries, sweet mocha oak, some dried fig aromatics, a little bit of leather and a hint of tobacco. The tannins give only a little bit of astringency to the aftertaste, but they give a lot of chewy, grainy texture to it.

Definitely the most developed wine in our tasting, but still it feels it is going up – there is quite much of life to the wine left (and some oak to integrate). Many people in the tasting felt like it was past its peak or just otherwise less impressive, but I enjoyed the lighter body of this wine, letting the acidity shine through nicely.

89/100
Summary: I do wonder, however, that how long-lived these wines really are? After all, at 9,99€ they are among the cheapest drinkable wines you can buy in Finland, and these kinds of wines usually drink well for 2–3 years. This wine, on the other hand, feels like it is still going up at over 10 years of age. This might not be the most complex or otherwise impressive of wines, but in its price point it is quite peerless. Worth 90 points if the oak ever integrates with the fruit before the wine falls apart with age. Among the Duc de Larsan wines we tasted, this was my wine of the night.

Our Wheel of Madiran from out Tannat tasting with the Duc de Larsan wines on the fore.
The bottom line is this: even in Finland there are wines under 10€ you can stash away in your cellar and enjoy them when they are 10 years old, or even older! Granted, these wines aren't spectacular wines in any way, but one really shouldn't expect that at this price point – and they turn out surprisingly enjoyable, given enough age.

Although the modern, oak-heavy style of Duc de Larsan didn't impress me that much, I was still nonplussed how nicely the wines performed at 10 years of age! Perhaps I will need to keep an eye of the better vintages in the future and stash away a case of them? At least this vertical tasting convinced me of the aging potential of this little big wine. One should also remember how it is possible to find tremendous value in wines of lesser-known regions, if one is only willing to do a little bit of researching.

July 22, 2017

Devín

Slovakia (NB: not Slovenia – that is further down south) is not particularly well-known as a wine country. Or, to put it more accurately; Slovakia is definitely one of the least known wine countries in Europe, mainly its wines known only in the neighboring countries. But unlike in the other unknown European wine countries, winemaking in Slovakia is not a recent trend: grapes have been grown in Slovakia for centuries, if not millennia, and – believe it or not – the historical wine region of Tokaj is partly located in Slovakia!

Historically the Slovak wine has been made from varieties that are also cultivated in the neighboring countries; the most widely grown variety is Grüner Veltliner of Austrian fame (known locally as Veltlínské Zelené), while some other popular varieties are Welschriesling (Rizling Vlašský), Blaufränkisch (Frankovka Modrá), Müller-Thurgau, St. Laurent (Svätovavrinecké), Pinot Blanc (Rulandské Biele and Riesling (Rizling Rýnsky). Also Cabernet Sauvignon has been gaining fame, but as Slovakia is a rather northerly country (latitudes comparable to Alsace, Baden or Wien), the variety often fails to ripen fully – rather than attempting to make thin and unimpressive red wine, the variety is usually vinified here into a dry or off-dry rosé wine that is light, refreshing and often exhibiting those vegetal bell pepper note of pyrazines found in Cabernet Sauvignon wines that have been picked very (or even too) early.

One thing that is a more recent trend in Slovakia is the emergence of grape crossings. And not just any crossings, but instead new ones that have been crossed in viticultural research centers in Slovakia during the past 50 or so years (although there are also a handful of crossings from other Eastern European countries in cultivation). In Slovakia, one can come across such varieties as Alibernet (a crossing of Alicante Bouschet and Cabernet Sauvignon), Neronet ((St. Laurent x Portugieser) x Alibernet)and Rimava (Abouriou x Castets). Some of the most popular Slovak crossings are red Dunaj ((Muscat Bouschet x Blaufränkisch) x St. Laurent) and white Devín (Gewürztraminer x Roter Veltliner), the latter of which we will look more into detail in this post.

Although the Slovak crossings currently contribute to only some 3% of the cultivated vine area in Slovakia, they are steadily becoming more popular. This is mainly because they have been specifically crossed from varieties that have been cultivated in Slovakia for long and thus are known to be well-suited for the local climate. However, their recent upsurge has most likely stemmed for the recent wine trend of interest in lesser-known varieties; people around the world don't want another Cabernet Sauvignon or Chardonnay anymore, but instead something with a local flair – a trend many Slovak wine growers are now trying to capitalize on. One should also remember that unlike those German crossings that are falling out of favor (like Dornfelder or Müller-Thurgau), these Slovak varieties have not been crossed to make incredibly high yields of uninteresting plonk, but instead wines of high quality and unique character.

The aforementioned Devín is currently the most popular white variety among these new Slovak crossings. This variety was crossed in 1958 in Modra, Slovakia, but cultivated on the Czech side of Czechoslovakia under the name Ryvola. Later on, the variety was renamed Devín, after the Devín castle, which is one of the oldest castles in Slovakia, located in Bratislava, close to the Austrian border. The variety became officially authorized in Slovakia in 1997 and in Czech Republic in 1998. As a cross of Gewürztraminer and Roter Veltliner, this variety normally reveals many characteristics of its parentage; the wines often sport those floral terpene notes from which Gewürztraminer is so well-known of, and it can get as weighty and bold as Roter Veltliners. Normally the wines show moderate to relatively high acidity, although they are prone to producing flabby, low-acid wines if harvested overripe. Currently there approximately 150 ha (375 acres) of Devín grown in Slovakia (less than 1% of the 19,600 ha (49,000 acres) of the total vineyard area) and only 20 ha (50 acres) in Czech Republic, but these number are predicted to grow in the future.

This spring I was invited to the Slovakian embassy in Helsinki to taste a selection of Slovak wines – truly a chance one wouldn't want to miss! Here is a selection of Devín wines I tasted there:

Topoľčianky Château Noir Devín 2016
  • Château Topoľčianky
  • Country: Slovakia
  • Region: Južnoslovenská
  • Grape(s): Devín (100%)
  • Tasted on: 30th of March, 2017





With its 420 ha (1,050 acres) of vineyards and annual production of over 5,000,000 bottles, Château Topoľčianky is the biggest producer in Slovakia. The winery was founded in 1933 in the village of Topoľčianky, which is situated in the Nitra region, located in the central parts of the southwestern Slovakia. The winery naturally has vineyards in the Nitra region, but also in the wine region of "Southern Slovakia" (Južnoslovenská), south from Nitra. This 100% Devín wine is fermented and aged in stainless steel.

Pale green color. The nose betrays is parentage with very Gewürztraminer-like aromas of rosewater and succulent, ripe pear with some sweet underlying hints of apricot candies. On the palate the wine feels quite full-bodied and slightly oily with moderately high acidity. There are flavors of somewhat Gewürztraminer-like floral complexity, juicy pear, some stony minerality and a curious hint of salty licorice. The wine finishes on a bright and refreshing note of acid-driven citrus fruits, stony minerality, sweet peach, some salty licorice and a hint of balancing bitterness.

Here we have a balanced and well-made Devín that shows the typical richness and floral qualities of the variety without coming across heavy, flabby or too low in acidity. On the contrary, the wine feels relatively high in acidity, especially towards the end of the aftertaste, balancing out the full body very nicely.

86/100
Summary: Overall this is a nice, easy-drinking everyday white from the weightier end. Not really the most complex effort, nor one that one should cellar for a long time, but one that can be easily paired with a great variety of different dishes, ranging from entrées to lighter main courses. A reliable entry-level Devín.

***

Karpatská Perla Varieto Devín 2015
  • Karpatská Perla
  • Country: Slovakia
  • Region: Malokarpatská
  • Grape(s): Devín (100%)
  • Tasted on: 30th of March, 2017




Karpatská Perla, founded in 1991, is a rather small winery cultivating their 50 ha of vineyards in the Malokarpatská ("Lesser Carpathian") wine region, located at the westernmost extreme of Slovakian border. On 2011, after 20 years of work, the winery won the Slovak Winery of the Year award, awarded by the association of Slovak wineries and winemakers. This single-vineyard Devín from their Varieto range is a wine made to show the typical characteristics of the variety, fermented and aged in stainless steel. 8,5 g/l of residual sugar and 7 g/l of acidity.

Pale yellow-green color. Youthful, fragrant and a bit restrained nose with delicate perfumed rose aromas and nuances of ripe apple. The wine feels ripe and moderately full-bodied on the palate with somewhat rich yet still rather delicate and nuanced flavors of sweet red apples, white flowers, some rosewater and a hint of apple peel bitterness. The acidity feels quite high, offsetting the residual sugar sweetness effortlessly. The refreshing finish is quite long and lively with flavors drier than on the midpalate; green apples, some apple peel bitterness and a hint of rosewater.

At close to 10 g/l of sugar I expected this wine to be something of a simple crowdpleaser, but it turned out to be a surprisingly balanced and nuanced effort. It isn't a fruit-forward entry-level wine, but instead a surprisingly sophisticated and elegant one.

90/100
Summary: Overall this wine reminds me of a well-made dry Muscat or Gewürztraminer, but with less exuberant floral character. Instead of making the wine feel simple and dull, the residual sugar here simply boosts the fruit and accentuates the richness, never really making the wine feel particularly sweet, not even off-dry. Very nice, recommended.

***

Nichta Devín 2015
  • Vino Nichta
  • Country: Slovakia
  • Region: Nitrianska
  • Grape(s): Devín (100%)
  • Tasted on: 30th of March, 2017





Vino Nichta, founded in 1997, is a family winery located in the Nitra wine region, situated in the southwest part of Slovakia. They cultivate a wide selection of different grape varieties over their 30 ha of vineyards, but Blaufränkisch, Devín, Gewürztraminer and Welschriesling cover a noticeable portion of their holdings. The Devín in their "Nichta" range is medium-sweet – a style that supposedly suits well this variety capable of accumulating high sugar levels – having 32 g/l of residual sugar, 6,6 g/l of acidity and 12% of alcohol.

Instead of the normal pale green Devín color, this wine is more deeper yellow with a pale golden hue. Unsurprisingly, the nose is quite sweet, but also rather restrained with delicate floral aromas, some ripe pear, hints of apple jam and a whiff of perfumed rosewater. On the palate the wine feels rich and half-sweet, yet surprisingly fresh and balanced. There are flavors of apple jam, exotic flowers, some steely minerality and a hint of cantaloupe. The residual sugar pushes the acidity down a little bit, making the wine come across medium in acidity with somewhat oily mouthfeel. The finish is pretty sweet, but also surprisingly long and refreshing with perfumed flavors of flowers, very ripe citrus fruits – even lemon marmalade, some cantaloupe and hints of rosewater.

Just like one of its parents, Gewürztraminer, Devín seems to carry even relatively high levels of residual sugar pretty well. The floral notes suit the sweetness pretty well and the acidity keeps the wine from coming across too sweet or flabby.

88/100
Summary: For a medium-sweet white wine (a style not really my cup of tea, unless it's a Mosel Riesling) this Devín felt like a very balanced and enjoyable effort, reminding me quite a lot of sweeter Alsatian Gewürztraminers. I can imagine a wine like this would suit a variety of hot Asian dishes prepared with chilies particularly well.

***

Editio Vinifera Cuvée Devín 2015
  • Vinalma with Karpatská Perla and Pavelka
  • Country: Slovakia
  • Region: Malokarpatská
  • Grape(s): Devín (80%), Gewürztraminer + Pálava (20%)
  • Tasted on: 30th of March, 2017





Vinalma is a Slovakian wine merchant specializing on Slovak and Spanish fine wines and Editio Vinifera is their own special line of fine wines that are made by Vinalma's oenologist Edita Ďurčová in collaboration with a ahndful high-quality Slovak wine producers. The Editio Vinifera wines aim to highlight the typical characteristics of the best Slovak wines through the use of the high-quality fruit, harvested in the regions these varieties perform the best, and sensible, pretty hands-off winemaking. I had a chance to discuss with mrs. Ďurčová on these wines and she explained to me among other things that the Devín grapes in this wine were sourced from Karpatská Perla, whereas the Gewürztraminer and Pálava grapes are sourced from the Pavelka & son winery. As the Slovakian Devín wines tend to be made in off-dry rather than bone-dry style, this wine has 9 g/l of residual sugar. Acidity is 7 g/l and alcohol 12,7%. To keep the floral characteristics of Devín on the fore, the wine sees no oak nor aging on the lees. The wine is bottled with minimal sulfite addition of 30 mg/l. Total production of this wine is only 1,000 bottles and 2% of the proceedings from Editio Vinifera sales go to support creative activities of mentally challenged people.

Pale lemon color. The sophisticated, fragrant nose shows perfumed meadow flower aromas, some ripe apple, a little bit of exotic spice and hints of honeydew melon. On the palate the wine feels full-bodied and rather ripe, borderline off-dry, with very Gewürztraminer-esque flavors of roses, meadow flowers and ripe apple, along with a nice streak of steely minerality and a hint of mirabelle plums. The acidity lingers in the background, giving the wine good structure and freshness and offsetting the sweetness from the residual sugar. The lively aftertaste follows the midpalate quite verbatim with fresh flavors of green apples, yellow plums, some meadow flowers and a hint of steely minerality.

Overall this is a lovely, balanced white wine that seems to capture the essence of Slovak Devín wines: sophisticated and balanced floral character; fruity flavors that are not quite bone-dry yet not off-dry either; round, moderately full body with balanced acidity; good richness with some weight but without any plump character or sense of heaviness.

91/100
Summary: Although not a 100% varietal Devín, this wine is a terrific example of the style that this variety is normally made in. It feels very versatile, so there's no need to overthink what to pair it with. However, I'd recommend to drink the wine within a few years, as it really doesn't feel particularly cellarworthy.

***

Overall it was both very fun and enlightening to taste through the different styles of Slovakian wines and out of the different local crossings I tasted, Devín definitely seemed one of the most promising! Stylistically it feels surprisingly versatile, making lovely, floral dry wines, yet carrying even relatively high levels of residual sugar with ease. Apparently the variety is also very popular with sweet dessert wines, but I've yet to taste any.

Although I tasted some pretty impressive Rizling Rýnsky (Riesling), Veltlínské Zelené (Grüner Veltliner) and Frankovka Modrá (Blaufränkisch) wines there as well, I really think that the future of Slovak wine might actually be in these Slovakian crossings. In my view, the wines made from these aforementioned "well-known" varieties face some serious challenges, the most notable being the Slovakian names for these varieties – which are both alien and quite difficult to pronounce for foreign consumers – and the competition with the neighboring countries. After all, is an average consumer more likely to pick up a Slovakian Rizling Rýnsky over a German Riesling? Or a Slovakian Veltlínské Zelené over an Austrian Grüner Veltliner? My guess is that 9 out of 10 wouldn't.

However, these new Slovak crossings are named quite smartly with short, marketable names that are easy to remember for even a foreign consumer, yet the names are also very Slovakian, so that the vine growers can easily relate to them. As this tasting showed me these crossings can produce wines of unique, but obviously high-quality character, they are a great choice for making wines that are both interesting to a consumer looking for wines that show local color, yet have no problems fitting the fine wine niche – at least after the Slovakian wine market evolves. The biggest challenge obviously is to communicate and create awareness of these wines in the global market, which isn't going to be an easy task – but I am certain that it will still be much easier than to compete with Rizling Rýnsky against German Riesling.

July 4, 2017

Vertical of the month: Château Musar 2000-2009

As my Vertical of the Month post on white Musar proved to be such a popular piece, it wasn't hard to decide writing a similar post on red Musar as well. However, I wanted a more concise theme this time so I decided on concentrating solely on the vintages of the 00's instead of a huge post on every red Musar I had tasted. The problem was that the belated vintage 2006 was yet to hit the market. However, in the late March 2017 the 2006 Musars finally arrived to the market, so all I needed to do was to acquire a bottle, taste it and write a piece on the 10 first Musars of this millennium. It took me a few more months to do this arduous task, but here we finally are.

Our lineup from 28th of May, 2016
Lebanese Château Musar (often written without the circumflex as Chateau Musar) is by far the best-known winery in the Levant and also among the best-known wineries in the natural wine movement. Unlike so many wineries of the modern natural wine movement who have started to produce wines more naturally around or after the turn of the millennium, Château Musar has produced their wines with minimal intervention since 1977, predating the vast majority of natural wine producers by a decade or a lot more. The method of production is quite simple at Château Musar: the grapes are crushed and left to ferment on the natural yeasts. No yeast inoculations, nutrients or other additives are used and the use of sulfur is kept at minimum, letting the nature go its course without winemaker's manipulation. The resulting wines are very often rustic and exhibiting characteristics like brettanomyces or pronounced volatile acidity – traits often considered as unwanted, even faults – yet also remarkably balanced and capable of aging easily for decades.

Chateau Musar is the top tier of the winery's range, above the simple, early-drinking Musar Jeune range and the single-vineyard Hochar Pére et Fils. Out of the wines in the Chateau Musar range, the red one comprises the great majority of production (from a third to almost half of the winery's total production of some 700–800,000 bottles), whereas the white's production normally hovers around the 10–30,000 bottle mark . The rosé is by far the rarest wine in the Chateau Musar range as it is not made every year – and in those years when it is made, the amount of bottles produced is only some thousands.

What is remarkable in Musar wines is that they have always been produced in a geopolitically highly volatile area, where tensions and shoot-outs are not uncommon. Despite these difficulties, the wines were produced systematically even during the Lebanese civil war (1975–1990), when tensions were at their highest and bombshells were exploding all the way from Beirut, where the winery is located, to Beqaa valley, where the vineyards lie, and even in the vineyards. However, occasionally the grapes could not be transported directly via roads (some 70 km / 45 miles) from the Beqaa valley to the winery due to the unstable situations; in some cases the grapes had to be transported by taking a longer (250 km / 150 miles) detour, and once even by driving to the seaside and shipping them from port to port. Against all odds, there have been only two vintages that have not been released to this date:
  • The vintage of 1976 was lost due to the civil war: unstable situations prevented the workers to reach the vineyards and the crop was lost.
  • The vintage of 1984 was made, but there were great difficulties reaching the vineyards and transporting the fruit back to the winery – as it was impossible to reach the winery by land due to roads being closed, it was necessary to ship the fruit by sea. Due to this, the grapes were very overripe and started fermenting on their own before the winery was reached. The wine was practically undrinkable due to heavy flaws for years, even decades, but recent tastings have confirmed that the wine has changed into something remarkable after having been cellared for more than 30 years. The wine, however, still remains unreleased at the time of writing.

If you are interested on reading more in-depth introduction to the history and philosophy of Château Musar, I highly suggest you to read my other Vertical of the Month on Musar Blanc 1991–2007.

Chateau Musar
  • Château Musar
  • Country: Lebanon
  • Region: Beqaa
  • Grape(s): Cabernet Sauvignon (1/3), Carignan (1/3), Cinsaut (1/3)






The red Musar is the wine this winery is best known for. It is traditionally a blend of Cabernet Sauvignon, Carignan and Cinsaut in more or less equal proportions, left to ferment in cement tanks on indigenous yeasts. After the fermentation, the wine is aged for 1 year in oak barrels (approx. 25–35% new), after which the wine is normally blended together and then returned back to marry in the concrete vats. After a suitable period of aging (1–2 years) the wine blend is bottled without any fining or filtration. What makes this wine so unique is that according to the winery's philosophy it is not released until the winery deems it ready, a process which normally takes 7–10 years – the vintage 2006 was released only after the vintage 2009, after more than ten years of aging! Furthermore, Musar normally keeps up to 25% of the annual production stored in their cellars for later release.

Chateau Musar 2009
  • Price: 35,70€ / 0,75
  • Tasted on: 20th of January, 2017

The 2009 vintage was particularly good, remaining quite dry through the whole growing season and keeping all the difficulties at bay. The only particularly wet moment before the harvest was in the late March, giving the vines much-needed water after the dry first three months. Due to the hot summer, the harvest was brought on exceptionally early, starting on the 2nd of September with Cabernet Sauvignon and finishing on the 8th of September with Cinsaut. The wines were blended together only after 3 years of aging. 14% alcohol.

The color seems rather concentrated with dark, almost black red color showing only very little translucency. There are initial aromas of ripe, sunny fruit and lighter, sweeter VA notes of nail polish on the nose, with more subtle notes of very dark forest berries, some raisined fruit, a little hint of sweet oak spice and a touch of Assam tea. On the palate this full-bodied wine feels very youthful, quite dry and rather fruit-forward with flavors of ripe red berries, exotic spices, some strawberry sweetness, light meaty notes and a hint of savory wood. The typical animal and barnyard notes of Musar are practically nonexistent and even the volatility feels quite restrained. There is a sense of firmness along with good structure resulting from the relatively noticeable tannins and moderately high acidity. The finish is opulent and juicy with ripe, plummy flavors of sunny dark and red fruits, some cassis notes, light Middle Eastern spice hints and a touch of dry, savory wood. The tannins give the sweet, supple finish some positive sense of grip and grit.

Lovely balance, structure and focus here. Although I often enjoy purity of fruit in wines, this vintage of Musar feels remarkably polished and fruit-forward, making me miss some of those more quirky characteristics of some of the older vintages.

92/100
Summary: Overall this is a really juicy and supple red Musar where the warm, sunny growing conditions are very obvious and which is lacking those rustic and funky notes typical of Musar. Nevertheless, the wine shows good aging potential and hopefully it will gain some more complexity and more interesting characteristics with age. Recommended, especially for cellaring.

***

Chateau Musar 2008
  • Price: 23,00€ / 0,75
  • Tasted on: 28th of May, 2016

The first few months of 2008 weren't particularly good with rain and snow, but after the late February no rains reached Beqaa for the rest of the season. The March was moderate followed by sunny spring, keeping the humidity (and the amount of weeds) very low. In mid-August a heat wave arrived, making the grapes reach maturity at the same moment, creating some logistical problems on the harvesting of grape varieties – normally the grapes mature at different times, so there is no need to worry whether some varieties would turn overripe while picking the others. Especially Cinsaut seemed to only benefit from the heat wave. The wines were blended together after 3 years of aging. 14% alcohol.

Youthful, dark, almost black cherry color with faint purple hues and moderate translucency. Lovely, complex and wild nose so typical of Musar: sweet volatile notes, rich kirsch-driven fruit, ripe and succulent red berries, sunny dark fruit, some acetone, a little prune and a hint of bretty funk. Very intense, structured and quite full-bodied palate with surprisingly concentrated flavors of ripe dark berries, toasted spices, some sweet plummy fruit, a little sour cherry and a hint of acetaldehyde salinity – all counterpointed by moderately pronounced bitterness. The wine is held together beautifully with moderate acidity and quite chewy, grainy tannins. The wine finishes on a moderately long, spicy and slightly bitter note with a bit of alcohol warmth and flavors of sour cherry, tart lingonberry and a hint of salinity in the aftertaste.

This vintage is a surprisingly concentrated and structured for a Musar, which is nice change after the weaker and somewhat disappointing 2007.

93/100
Summary: The wine feels very imposing with its brooding, dark-toned fruit and those typical volatile-and-funky Musar notes; although promising, it seems to be in a bit awkward phase right now. Currently it requires easily more than just 2 hours of decanting which we had; however, I recommend giving the wine at least a decade more before opening it. Very, very recommended; definitely one of the most promising Musars in a while with good possibility of hitting a much higher score with age.

***

Chateau Musar 2007
  • Price: 35,70€ / 0,75
  • Tasted on: 28th of January, 2016
2007 was an uneven vintage with a sudden spring frost disturbing the growth cycle, cloudy and rainy May preventing 30% of flowering and a three-week heat wave in August hastening the ripening process before the harvest. All the three grape varieties matured very quickly and at the same time, creating some logistical problems to and in the winery. 14% alcohol.

Quite opaque, dark cherry color with figgy purple overtones. Slightly reticent and quite dry nose with slight greenness that lacks the typical sweeter sunny fruit character of Musar; there are aromas of ripe red berries, slightly unripe blue- and blackberries, some vaguely off-putting, chemical VA aromas, a little bit of cedary wood and hints of raisined fruit. Medium-to-full-bodied on the palate, coming across as quite austere and tannic for a Musar. There are youthful, but more dry than sweet flavors of ripe dark fruit, juicy yet bitter red forest berries, some volatility and a hint of sour cherry. Although the acidity is modest at best, the wine seems both quite tightly wound and a bit muted, even backward. The rather pronounced bitterness gives the wine some sense of structure, but also emphasizes the tannins in a not altogether pleasant way. Quite long, bitter and complex finish with juicy flavors of ripe dark berries, peppery spice and some tannic astringency with a bit of alcohol heat.

This might be an enjoyable and drinkable Musar, but compared to the usual house style, the wine seems rather austere, unresolved and backward. Although I'm a big fan of Musar, this time it just doesn't make the cut. I am not sure whether the wine is in some very awkward phase, or if it is just an off vintage.

87/100
Summary: Definitely a hard fellow now in its youth, but also seeming to lack focus and balance: there is a lot of structure – especially tannin-wise – and also some pronounced bitterness, but very little fruit to balance them out. I hope that the wine is in an awkward phase and it will resolve beautifully, but it can be that this is just an off vintage and it will never turn out to be anything truly memorable. Quite good and interesting for a red wine, but a disappointment for a young Musar. I'm keeping my fingers crossed for the 2007's I have in my cellar.

***

Chateau Musar 2006
  • Price: 31,95€ / 0,75
  • Tasted on: 23rd of June, 2017

A very difficult vintage, but not that much because of the climatic conditions – which were remarkable by themselves, feeling like a never-ending spring with only 10 days of summer weather – but due to the conflict between Hezbollah and Israel. Although it seemed that there wouldn't be a harvest at all, everybody still carried on normally despite the volatile conditions and fortunately a ceasefire came before the harvest. However, unlike the vintages that normally feel ready to be released after 7 years of aging, this wine was still in shambles in 2013, which is why the winery decided to postpone the release for a year. And then another. And yet another. Finally, the wine was ready for release in the spring of 2017. 14% alcohol.

Somewhat translucent dark cherry color that doesn't look that youthful anymore, but doesn't betray the +10 years of age either. Quite opulent, ripe and juicy nose which isn't that funky, but showing some acetic VA notes along with aromas of very ripe plums, even prunes, overripe blackberries, some sun-baked earth and hints of raisined fruit. Full-bodied on the palate with moderately high acidity but rather mellow tannins. There are flavors of fresh blackberries, overripe dark plums, exotic spice, some blackcurrant jam and hints of acetic volatility. Although the wine tastes quite dry, notes of dried prunes and raisins create an illusion of sweetness, giving the wine more juiciness and rounding its corners. The finish is medium-long with supple flavors of ripe and sweet dark forest fruits, black cherries, some plums, a bit of tannic bitterness and hints of peppery spice. The acidity makes the wine finish on a more tart lingonberry note along with a lightly gritty tannic grip.

A vintage that was anticipated for a long time, but which ultimately fails to captivate upon release. The wine might be quite balanced and enjoyable, but it is also quite mellow and rather tame effort for a Musar with a surprisingly noticeable raisiny character, especially given the cooler vintage.

90/100
Summary: Overall this wine feels, quite surprisingly, like a lighter take on those very ripe, raisiny and high-alcohol Plavac Mali wines grown in the southern Croatia. This soon after release the wine doesn't feel a remarkable vintage, but neither is this a disappointment like the 2007. Perhaps – and hopefully – the wine will gain some welcome complexity with age.

***

Chateau Musar 2005
  • Price: 35,90€ / 0,75
  • Tasted on: 28th of January, 2016

Unlike in most European wine countries, the 2005 was an atypically cool and humid vintage in Lebanon, resulting in harvest delayed more than a week from normal schedule (the harvest of red varieties was finished on 18th of September) and with wines showing lower than average alcohol and higher acidity. 14% alcohol.

Slightly translucent dark cherry color. Opulent, complex and ever so slightly volatile nose with lovely richness. Sweet, sunny aromas of plummy fruit, ripe figs, lilac, some red cherry, mature floral nuances, a little acetone VA and a touch of funky brett – although the succulent fruit tends to drown out the bretty barnyard character. Supple, full-bodied palate with good tannin structure and balanced, moderately high acidity. Ripe, succulent flavors of ripe plums, sweet figs, some rustic, bretty character, a little sun-baked earth, hints of jammy dark-skinned berries and a touch of dried prunes and raisins. Surprisingly robust and bold effort for a Musar, yet with fruit and body to match. Long and complex finish with a bit rustic and slightly astringent aftertaste of leather, bitter spices, ripe plummy fruit, some dried dark berries and a hint of bretty barnyard notes.

Overall 2005 feels a remarkable vintage for a red Musar (and white as well) resulting in a stunning combination of robust structure of both acidity and tannins and ripe, succulent fruit.

95/100
Summary: Lacking the finesse and delicate balance of the finer vintages, the red 2005 is all about power, intensity and – above all – cellaring potential. With fruit, body and structure as remarkable as these, I have no doubts that the wine wouldn't survive at least a quarter of a century in a good wine cellar. Drinking this wine now would be a travesty – try to get this stuff as many as you can and open the first one only after a decade. It will be worthwhile.

***

Chateau Musar 2004
  • Tasted on: 28th of January, 2016

A very cool vintage: snow didn't melt until March, spring lasted until June and the ripening period was slowed down by constant cooler breezes. The grapes never developed much acidity and the first grapes arriving to the winery were rather low in sugar as well. However, a two-week heat wave that arrived during the harvest boosted the sugar levels in the remaining grapes. The wine was made in the traditional method: 9 months of aging in cement vats, 1 year in oak barrels, blending and maturation for 9 months in cement vats, finished with bottling and extended bottle aging before release. 14% alcohol.

Almost black cherry color with slightly maroon rim and only a little translucency. Ripe and sunny yet a bit understated nose with a bit sweet aromas of crushed ripe forest berries, some succulent plummy fruit and a hint of car paint volatility. Moderately full-bodied and velvety palate with soft medium acidity. Rich, opulent flavors of sweet dark cherries, dark-skinned berries, some kirsch and a hint of acetic volatility. Moderately tannic, but still showing suave smoothness without any coarse character. Long, complex and a bit grippy finish with quite light flavors of peppery spice and allspice and turmeric, ripe dark cherry, some tart lingonberry, alittle bit of sour cherry bitterness and a hint of dusty earthiness.

A smooth and classy Musar with hints of sweetness and less emphasis on the tannic structure. Shows hints of volatility, but is far from the funkiest end of Musars.

91/100
Summary: Not as open and expressive as many vintages before and after this, but that isn't necessarily a bad thing; also, the wine seems to have resolved from the clunky phase it was earlier this year (January 2016). Drinking nicely now, will keep easily for many years. Not the most typical Musar with its sweet, fruit-forward character and rather low acidity, but still very beautiful. Recommended.

***

Chateau Musar 2003
  • Price: 31,40€ / 0,75
  • Tasted on: 15th of February, 2013

The winter of 2003 was the rainiest in 15 years in Beqaa, but after April, no rain fell. A long heat wave in May decreased yields by 30%, concentrating the acidity and sugar levels in the remaining grapes substantially. However, July and August were cooler than normal, delaying the ripening process. Still, the harvest was carried out by normal schedule. The maceration was carried out over 3 weeks with maceration, resulting in firm, structured wines. The wines were aged for 9 months in cement vats, 12 months in Nevers oak barrels, blended together and matured for a further 6 months in cement vats before bottling. First released in 2010. 14% alcohol.

Quite translucent, dark ruby color with a slightly maroon hue. Very rich, expressive and aromatic nose with complex and even somewhat animal aromas of leather, tobacco, dried figs, wizened dark berries, some barnyard funk and a hint of sunny dark fruit. With some air, the bouquet gains also some nuances of floral perfume, licorice root and the faintest touch of cedar. The wine is quite rich, full-bodied and powerful on the palate with ripe, slightly sweet and intense flavors of sunny dark fruit, roasted spices, ripe red cherries, figs, some tobacco, a little sweaty saddle leather and a hint of cigar box. Though the flavors are quite sweet, overall the wine still tastes dry and relatively robust. The structure relies mainly on good, bright acidity, as the ample but fine tannins are rather mellow and friendly, giving the wine more sense of firmness than noticeable grip. Only the high-ish alcohol shows a little through. The finish is very long, complex and quite powerful with flavors of leather, cedar, dried figs, some dark chocolate chips, a hint of tobacco and a touch of rough animal funk.

This is truly a textbook example of a superb vintage Musar. Although starting to show some developed character at 10 years of age, this vintage has still a lot more to go before reaching its peak. At only 31,40€ this wine shows incredible value.

95/100
Summary: Even by Musar standards this vintage shines above its peers, being an incredibly attractive, complex and elegant effort. Not challenging by any means, but still showing quite much of that hallmark funk of the house – although this was not overtly dirty or super-volatile, it showed more of that attractive leathery and animal character than your average Musar. Still a baby with plenty of miles ahead, so no need to open this now – this'll age gracefully for decades.

***

Chateau Musar 2002
  • Tasted on: 28th of January, 2016

In 2002 long, cold and rainy weather pushed the ends of the winter and the spring back, all the way into late June, followed by a mild July and, suddenly, hot August. The ripening process was delayed accordingly, the harvest starting two weeks behind the normal schedule, starting on 15th of September. The maturity of grapes was extremely varied from vineyard to vineyard, so instead of picking the varieties one by one, the harvest had to be done vineyard by vineyard, according to the maturity. The fermentation and maceration times were much longer than normal this year. After 6 months of aging in concrete vats, the wines were racked into oak barrels for one year. After the oak aging the wines were blended together and matured for a further year in oak casks before bottling. 14% alcohol.

Rather translucent, yet a bit hazy, dark cherry color with some orange bricking towards the rim. A bit restrained nose with delicate aromas of sweet, dark-skinned berries, figs, some car paint VA, something a little biscuity, a hint of plum marmalade and prunes with a whiff of powdery oak. Ripe, medium-bodied and surprisingly acid-driven palate with complex, savory flavors of ripe plummy fruit, dark-skinned forest berries, peppery, bitter spiciness, some aromatic and sweet clove spice, a little balsamic volatility and a hint of sweet red cherry. Quite soft and ripe but firm enough tannins. The lengthy finish carries the bitter, spicy note while turning the fruity notes into something more earthy and savory; along with the flavors of ripe and sweet dark-skinned berries, complex flavors of clove, funky brett, some sun-baked earth and hints of sweaty leather become more pronounced.

This vintage is a bit atypical for Musar, but still in a lovely way: the wine is not that open and expressive as some, yet still it shows lots of those typical, Musary notes of sunny fruit, animal, volatility and earth. It is actually surprisingly delicate and sophisticated in its expression compared to many other, more voluminous vintages with bigger fruit, yet still sporting a surprisingly pronounced wild-and-funky side as well.

92/100
Summary: Perhaps this is not a vintage that'll keep for several decades like the best ones – although I wouldn't be that surprised even if it actually did! At least the wine is not showing any real signs of maturity now, only some depth and complexity that the wine gains with bottle age, giving the wine good cellaring potential for at least a decade more. An attractive example of a more subtle expression of Musar.

***

Chateau Musar 2001
  • Tasted on: 28th of January, 2016

A very hot and dry vintage: by mid-February the weather turned to much more warmer than usual with almost nonexistent rains. After relatively normal weather during the flowering, the weather turned hotter than normal for July and August, resulting in 15% reduction in yield. The harvest was carried ahead of the schedule, starting already on 3rd of September. The Cinsaut suffered from the hot weather, losing some of its color; thus, the percentage of Cinsaut is somewhat lower in this year's blend compared to other vintages. As normal, the wine was fermented and aged in cement vats for 9 months, aged in oak for 12 months, blended together and matured for a further year in cement vats before bottling. 13,5% alcohol.

Rather translucent dark cherry color with some orange bricking towards the almost clear rim. Lovely and attractive nose, with lovely depth and complexity – although the volatile acidity aromas so typical of Musar seem to be more pungent, chemical and glue-like instead of those sweeter, nuanced balsamico notes more typical of the house. Modestly developed aromas of savory dark berries, tart red berries, sunny dark fruit and some dark cherry with a little earthy sous-bois and a hint of dried, dusty leather. On the palate the wine is a lot sweeter, rich and suave than the nose suggests, with a supple, full body. Ripe, complex and dark-toned flavors of plummy fruit, aromatic spice, some fig, a little cherry, hints of leathery brett and a touch of paint thinner VA – intermingled with juicy, meaty notes. Moderately grippy, firm, dusty tannins and relatively high acidity give the wine good structure. Rich, quite robust and slightly grippy finish with savory flavors of ripe, dark-toned fruit, sour cherry, bitterness, some leather, a little salty acetaldehyde tang and a slightest touch of herbal greenness.

This is a delightful and surprisingly imposing – even somewhat brooding – vintage of Musar with surprisingly powerful structure and lots of depth and complexity but very little of that bretty barnyard funk.

93/100
Overall the 2001 does not seem as elegant and sophisticated as some vintages (some might consider calling a wine as wild and funky as Musar as "sophisticated" or "elegant" a travesty) with its roughness, occasionally slightly glue-like and more off-putting than attractive VA characteristics and slight greenness, but it still manages to hit many sweet spots with its combination of mature nuances and powerful, grippy character. Although starting to show some more developed notes, the structure seems quite unresolved even after 15 years – this is definitely a keeper with possibility for a higher score with more age. Tasty stuff now with right food, but a wine to be aged a lot more if enjoyed on its own. Very recommended.

***

Chateau Musar 2000
  • Tasted on: 28th of January, 2016

A warm and dry summer with hot July and temperatures above average in August. Released in 2007, alcohol 13,5%.

Translucent, medium deep red color tending to maroon. Rather reticent and restrained, but also nicely matured and savory nose with aromas of cherry, roasted spices, pencil shavings, dusty sun-baked earth, some developed and wizened dark fruit, a hint of reductive gunpowder smoke and a whiff of bretty funk. Full-bodied, noticeably spicy and structured palate with moderately developed, ripe and savory flavors of dark forest fruits, ripe red cherry, sweet sunny fruit, aromatic spices, some dried fig, a little pipe tobacco and a hint of bitter, sour cherry. The midpalate has a slightly pungent, saline streak giving the wine a bright, aldehydic Fino Sherry-esque overtone, supported by moderately high acidity. The wine has firm, ripe and slightly grippy tannins, giving it sense of firmness and good structure. The long, complex and generous finish is full of layered, interweaving notes of roasted spices, bitter sour cherry, dark sunny fruit, some dusty earth and a hint of dried figs. In the end, there is a lovely, slightly saline acetaldehyde lift.

Somehow this vintage of Musar seems a bit difficult one with atypical smoky and saline notes, yet still the wine does not come across as awkward or clumsy, but very delightful and tasty. Although these atypical notes give the wine some unique complexity, they also distract a little bit from the honest Musary core of sunny dark fruit and nuanced, earthy tones. Additionally, this is one of the less bretty and volatile vintages, with almost none of those leathery, barnyardy and balsamico notes apparent.

91/100
Summary: A Musar that is starting to exhibit some aged complexity in addition to the primary, fruity characteristics. The wine will most likely keep for a good while, but I'm not 100% sure whether it'll keep for a decade more – structure-wise there is a lot of aging potential, but the wine seems to lack focus and I hope it will not start to fall apart with more age. Despite of its lack of typicity, still recommended. This is a good and enjoyable Musar, but not among the great vintages.

***

For long I had a mnemonic for Musar vintages that odd ones are the ones you want to keep and even ones the ones you'll probably want to skip. Not that you'd want to skip any vintage of Musar, but pushed to make a choice over two vintages, I'd go for an odd vintage.

However, 2007 and 2008 changed this pattern: having tasted the 2007 in three different occasions over a six-month time span I must admit, it has turned out to be a disappointment of sorts. 2008, on the contrary, was a really tightly-knit and promising one, feeling almost too young but still full of cellaring potential. Most likely both of them will get better with age, but I expect a lot more from 2008 than from 2007 now.

The vintages 2009 and 2006 that followed, in that order, followed the logic of my mnemonic; although not as impressive as the vintages 2003 or 2005 were, the 2009 was still more lush and opulent effort, whereas the 2006 felt a bit more restrained and underwhelming, true to the even-numbered vintage style – which was also a bit disappointing, seeing how every Musarophile was waiting for its release for more than three years after it wasn't released according to the normal release schedule of Musar.

Our lineup from 28th of January, 2016
All in all, I hope that this guide through a decade of Musars will be of some help if you ever come across of multiple vintages of Musars and you are pressed to choose only one or some among them. Overall the first 10 years of the 21st century seem to have produced some very attractive and delightful wines, practically all of them capable of surviving at least 10 years of cellaring, some of them even multiple decades. Only the vintage 2007 seems to be a bit of an underachiever now, but perhaps with some age it can turn out all right. Practically all the other vintages are more or less safe bets: some are drinking nicely now and some only after some years, even a decade in the cellar, but most of the wines are actually really lovely now yet they sport remarkable cellaring potential – true to the classic Musar style.